麻豆传媒集团

Closing the gap: CBIE Catalyst Award-winning book tackles international education policy in Canada

By Perry King
December 14, 2020
OISE logo on a University of Toronto blue background.

International education policy in Canada is complicated by the country鈥檚 decentralized nature 鈥 its role in foreign policy, immigration and citizenship 鈥 and the provincial authority of education. 

So, to produce the award-winning International Education as Public Policy in Canada required a national collaboration of experts, from coast-to-coast-to-coast. This book, published in 2020, provides a comprehensive analysis of international education policy in Canada, tracing the complex history of when, how, and why it emerged as a policy area of strategic importance.

OISE鈥檚 Dean, Glen Jones, and two OISE alumna, Merli Tamtik and Roopa Desai Trilokekar, led the book project and have been recognized for their leadership by the Canadian Bureau of International Education (CBIE). The Catalyst Award is a part of CBIE鈥檚 annual Excellence Awards docket, awarded to an individual or group for bringing cutting-edge knowledge to the field of international education.

In receiving the award, the team is proud of the work that can now be accessed by scholars and practitioners nationwide. But, they give tremendous credit to their contributors, who brought a variety of regional and theoretical perspectives to the textbook.

鈥淚鈥檓 particularly proud of the breadth of regional and theoretical expertise that our chapter authors brought to the volume,鈥 said Dean Jones. 鈥淚 am also extremely proud that our contributors included both very junior scholars who bring fresh ideas, as well as highly respected established scholars who have shared their expertise on these very complex policy issues.鈥

Tamtik, an Assistant Professor in Educational Administration at the University of Manitoba, believes being recognized by CBIE, which services professionals in the field, is significant. 鈥淚t's very common to be recognized by a scholarly organization. But then your communication and your work stays within that community,鈥 said Tamtik, who earned a master鈥檚 and a doctorate from OISE. 鈥淚 think this has given us a larger exposure to people who are in the practice of international education, who are professionals, scholar practitioners.

鈥淚t gives us a wider audience to outreach and an opportunity to affect both policy and practice.鈥

The book looks at international education from a policy perspective, an outlook propelled with the guidance of Trilokekar鈥檚 expertise.

鈥淚 was interested in examining the issue of international education from a policy lens because there's very little discussion on international education as an area of policy study,鈥 said Trilokekar, an Associate Professor from York University鈥檚 Faculty of Education.

Roopa and Merli had early conversations about compiling a book at an education conference. 鈥淎nd I've known Professor Jones since my PhD and we鈥檝e always had these conversations about this field. It was a conversation three of us have been having for a while knowing that this was a gap in the field. So, it came naturally for three of us to have connected this way.鈥

They carefully developed the structure of the book and then reached out to their networks to identify chapter authors. The text looks at the topic in three distinct sections: federal policy, provincial policy, and critical perspectives, including some quite original approaches. 

The book, which has representation from nine provinces, even from Prince Edward Island, looks at Nunavut鈥檚 policy outlook, and includes an analysis of internationalization and Indigenization in Canada 鈥 not to mention critiques of these policy approaches, writ large.

The text, says Tamtik, is 鈥渂oundary-pushing in a sense that it examines internationalization beyond mobility discourses, analyzes ways in which international education policies have impacted Canadian federal-provincial relation, drawing governments closer together.鈥

鈥淭here hasn鈥檛 been a book that has brought together the Canadian story on international education in this way,鈥 added Trilokekar. 鈥淚 think for us, it was also the narrative of the Canadian story, which was important.

鈥淭hat narrative is one about how policy has shifted, changed, developed over time,鈥 she adds. 鈥淚f you see the way we've mapped it in the book, through all of the stories of the federal government, of the provinces, you see the shift that has occurred in policymaking, and the shifts that will continue to occur, I think there are some implications of where we will be headed and where policy could go, but maybe hasn't gone.鈥

The trio hopes readers take away something substantial from the text. 鈥淚nternational education has become a core pillar in Canadian society, and a pillar that has been more and more informed by the policy approaches from the government,鈥 said Tamtik.  鈥淚t didn't use to be that way because the institutions were always driving international education. But now we're seeing much more attention from the governments, provincial and federal, when it comes to international education.鈥

鈥淚 think the message that is core to our higher education systems, whether they're colleges or universities or K to 12 systems, is that international education has become core to education in Canada,鈥 said Trilokekar. 鈥淭hat's a central message that comes about, but also that there is great potential to steer it in different directions and in different ways that we may not have considered.

The book speaks to different audiences in different ways, she adds. 鈥淭here's a takeaway for many, and I think our hope is that as international education grows as a field of study, that people are able to pull from chapters of the book as a textbook, or pieces of text that they can use in their courses鈥 as they study the field and understand policy development, impact and influences.

Share this Article: